Taunton Public Schools
TECHNOLOGY PLAN 2007-2010
| Benchmark 1 Commitment to a Clear Vision & Implementation Strategies |
Current and Proposed Status of Guidelines
The following illustrates the Current Status of Taunton's technology to the
DOE Benchmarks and Proposed Direction by the new Technology Plan.
| DOE Benchmark | Taunton's 2007 Status | Proposed Direction | Progress |
| A. Clear Goals |
|
| Progress will be updated in June of each year. |
| The district's technology plan contains a clearly stated and reasonable set of goals and implementation strategies that align with the district-wide school improvement plan. The district is committed to achieving its vision by the end of the school year 2010-2011. | The technology plan in the past strived to support both the district's goals and the DOE's benchmarks. To support both the District and the State Benchmarks, a cross-referencing or check needs to be conducted, and gaps need to be highlighted. |
| In process |
| B. Technology Team |
|
|
|
| The district has a technology team with representatives from a variety of stakeholder groups, including school committee members, administrators, and teachers. The technology team has the support of the district leadership team. | The District has multiple technology groups.
| The District will continue with the same with the below recommendations: 1. District Technology Team: Keep as is, replacing people as needed. Keep a notebook with sign-ins and minutes. 2. Working Technology Team: Keep as is. 3. Technology Plan Advisory Group:
4. Administration:
| Link to District Technology Team Working Technology Team Link to Advisory Group We have not met consistently this year. Recommend that we meet one time prior to end of year to go over next year's recommendations and then get back on a schedule as outlined by the Technology Plan for 2008-2009. Administration: Report directly to Dr. Steven Leonard, Asst. Supt. for Curriculum & Instruction |
| C. Needs Assessment |
|
|
|
| 1. The district assesses the technology products and services that will be needed to improve teaching and learning. | 1. Currently create surveys and focus groups to evaluate products or give feed back on current products. 2. Technology Director belongs to regional technology group which provides comparison information 3. On large ticket items, gathers information on at least 3 products for comparison. |
| 1. Assessments are gathered through student outcomes and through surveys 2. Technology Director attends local and regional technology meetings. 3. Follow all laws for procurement which includes gathering information on more than 1 product. |
| 2. The technology plan includes an assessment of the services and products that are currently being used and that the district plans to acquire. | 1. Currently creates surveys and focus groups to evaluate products or give feed back on current products. |
| 1. Laptop carts: conduct year end survey on teacher/students perception of use and ways to improve usage. |
| D. CIPA Compliance |
|
|
|
| The district has a CIPA-compliant Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) regarding Internet and network use. The policy is updated as needed to help ensure safe and ethical use of resources by teachers and students. | The district currently has an Acceptable Use Policy in place. It is getting old and needs to be updated and re-introduced to district. |
| To be done School Year 2009-2010 |
| E. Budget |
|
|
|
| The district has a budget for its local technology plan with line items for technology in its operational budget.
|
|
| Budget has been drafted and given to Business Manager. Request for staff have been submitted. (Spring 2009, hired 2 network adminsitrators to replace vacant positions). DESE grants have been posted and will be applied for. E-Rate discounts have been applied for and non-discounted portions will be paid by District. |
| E. Evaluation |
|
|
|
| 1. The district evaluates the effectiveness of technology resources toward attainment of educational goals on a regular basis. |
|
| End of year surveys and reports to be conducted on content software and resources (Waterford, Successmaker, Study Island, MyAccess) TechnologyEvaluation system to be developed. |
DESE Approval Letter April 2009